State v. Noble
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*48EDMONDS, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search incident to his arrest. We affirm.
After defendant was convicted of harassment, ORS 166.065, and attempted third degree escape, ORS 162.145, he was placed on probation with the condition that he pay a fine. When he failed to pay the fine, the trial judge ordered him to show cause why probation should not be revoked and issued a warrant for his arrest. The warrant was not supported by an affidavit or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. RidderbushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. MundtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. SchellhornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. HoskinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. HoskinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.