Legal Opinion

State v. Caraher

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1982No. CA A20330, SC 28360PublishedCited by 268 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*743ROBERTS, J.

The issue in this case is whether a search of defendant’s purse, including the opening of the coin compartment of a wallet within that purse, conducted without a warrant, after defendant was arrested and placed in a police car and the purse had been taken from her, is a search incident to arrest and therefore an exception to the warrant requirement of the fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution and article 1, section 9 of the Oregon Constitution.1

Defendant has no prior criminal record and, until the events discussed here, had never been arrested. She came to police attention…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by268 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API