Legal Opinion
State v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 8, 1992No. C89-01-30382; CA A62825PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*546DE MUNIZ, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions on two counts of being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search of his residence. We conclude that defendant’s consent to the search was obtained by exploitation of illegal police conduct, and we reverse.
The facts are undisputed. Defendant was subject to deportation, because he was an alien who had been convicted of possession of a controlled substance.1 United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Agent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BridgesHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. TorresHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.