Legal Opinion

State v. Noble

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1992No. CC 10-89-02085; CA A63703; SC S38601PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

At issue in this case is whether a judge may issue a bench warrant of arrest based on his or her determination, by reference to court records but without reference to a sworn statement, that a person is in contempt of court. We hold that, before an arrest warrant may issue for contempt that did not occur “in the presence of the court,” a judge must determine the existence of probable cause by reference to a sworn statement. Or Const, Art I, § 9. Absent that determination and basis for it, a warrant is invalid. In this case, the trial court erred in finding that a bench warrant issued on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Utley v. City of IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Jaehne v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SpainhowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. SealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. HoskinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API