State v. Ridderbush
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
This is a criminal case in which we are called on to determine whether the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress a straight razor discovered in a small black box was error under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution as either: (1) an improper search incident to arrest; or (2) an improper inventory search. We reverse and remand.
It was error for the trial court to deny defendant’s motion to suppress, because the search at the police station which revealed the razor was improper both as a search incident to arrest under State v. Caraher, 293 Or 741, 653 P2d 942…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. MundtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. RoundsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.