Legal Opinion

State v. Hoskinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1993No. 9106-1185; CA A73746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction by the trial court for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the admission of evidence seized from his wallet. We affirm.

Defendant was driving his car when he was stopped by an officer from the Lebanon Police Department who knew that defendant’s drivers license was suspended. After the officer confirmed by radio that the license was suspended, defendant was handcuffed. The officer conducted a “pat down” search of defendant as part of his routine safety check. He felt a wallet in defendant’s back pocket and removed it. While…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HoskinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HoskinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API