Legal Opinion

Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 7, 2000No. Slip Op. 00-66; Court 99-06-00362PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

This case comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Rule 56.2 Motion For Judgment Upon The Agency Record (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”), challenging the decision of the International Trade Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) in Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination; Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium, 64 Fed.Reg. 15567 (1999) {“Final Determination ”). Plaintiffs dispute Commerce’s finding in this investigation that certain programs or transactions did not confer countervailable subsidies upon a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rhodia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  2. Baoding Yude Chemical Industry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  3. Usec Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  4. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  5. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API