Legal Opinion
Rhodia, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 30, 2001No. Consol. 00-08-00407PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
This ease is before the court on motions for judgment upon the agency record challenging certain aspects of the International Trade Administration of the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) Notice of Final Determination: Sales at Less than Fair Value: Bulk Aspirin from the People’s Republic of China, 65 Fed.Reg. 33,805 (Dep’t Commerce May 25, 2000), as amended, 65 Fed. Reg. 39,598 (Dep’t Commerce June 27, 2000) (‘Final Determination”) and the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, P.R. Doc. No. 155 (May 17, 2000) (“Decision…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Hebei Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- China National MacHinery Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.