Legal Opinion
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 22, 2015No. Slip Op. 15-36; Court 14-00214PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:
Before the court is a challenge to Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Turkey, 79 Fed.Reg. 41964 (July 18, 2014), PDoc 369, and aceompany-ing issues and decision memorandum (July 10, 2014) (“IDM ”), PDoc 363, (collectively “Final Determination”), a final affirmative countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigation determination conducted by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). The period of investigation (“POI”) is January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012.
The plaintiffs 1 challenge these…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maverick Tube Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Özdemir Boru San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Hitachi Energy USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Royal Brush Mfg., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.