Roe v. Walsh
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered October 14, 1912, in favor of the plaintiff, upon sustaining a demurrer to defendants’ cross-complaint, in an action of ejectment.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought to recover possession of the north four feet of lot 11, block 5, Nagle’s addition to the city of Seattle. The defendants answered the complaint, admitting the legal title to be in the plaintiffs, and alleged, by way of cross-complaint, that they were the owners of a strip of land' 21.6 inches wide on the north side of lot 11; that they were entitled to an easement upon a strip of land about 12 feet wide along the north side of lot 11; and, also, to an easement for light and air on account of a building erected upon the south half of lot 10. The plaintiffs thereupon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keats v. HugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Turner v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Flynn v. GlennyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Malsch v. WaggonerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Bailey v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Strom v. ArcoraceWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Windsor v. BourcierWashington Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.