Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Brooks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1970No. 68-658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The sole issue before this court is whether a Municipal Court judge has the power to extend the time for filing a bill of exceptions in a criminal case.

Chapter 1901, Revised Code, contains provisions -with respect to jurisdiction, procedure and appeal for municipal courts. Section 1901.21, Revised Code, found within that chapter, provides, in part, as follows:

“(A) In a criminal case or proceeding, the practice, procedure, and mode of bringing and conducting prosecutions for offenses, and of filing bills of exceptions, and the power of the court in relation thereto, are the same as those which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henrich v. Hoffman, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. DecamilloAshtabula County Court of Common Pleas · 1961
  4. Kinsey v. Bower, Aud.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Cleveland v. GunnOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Cincinnati v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. City of Cincinnati v. Acme Barrel & Drum Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API