City of Cincinnati v. Parker

The narrow holdings of the Court of Common Pleas and Court of Appeals in this case are difficult to isolate owing to the vague entries of those courts. Examination of the entire record in this case reveals that *210the only apparent basis of decision was that appellants failed to file a bill of exceptions within ten days of the overruling of a motion for a new trial by the Municipal Court as ostensibly required by R. C. 1913.32.

The same question was presented to this court in the case of Cincinnati v. Brooks, 21 Ohio St. 2d 73, wherein we concluded in the syllabus:

“2. The 1965 amendment (131 Ohio…