Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Acme Barrel & Drum Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1971No. 70-337Published

1Opinion of the CourtDuNCAN, J.

In Cincinnati v. Parker (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 209, 211, this court adopted and applied the opinion and syllabus in Cincinnati v. Brooks, 21 Ohio St. 2d 73, holding that a Municipal Court has the power to extend the time for filing a bill of exceptions.

The facts in the ease are not in dispute. It appears that the Municipal Court’s entry extending the time for filing the bill of exceptions was misplaced, and was not before the Court of Appeals when it ruled on the motion to dismiss the appeal, but the entry was later discovered and presented to the Court of Appeals on appellant’s motion for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ohio v. HoltOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of Cincinnati v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API