Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Brooks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1970No. 68-658PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have before us the motion of plaintiff-appellee for reconsideration and dismissal. The r<>n-*154son assigned is that the questions involved were moot at the time the decision, reported in 21 Ohio St. 2d 73, was rendered.

A review of the docket entries below indicates that the question presented in the appeal to this court was mooted on January 8, 1969, when the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County sustained a motion for leave to appeal in C. A. No. 10745. After that date, therefore, there was no reason whatever for further prosecution in this court of the appeal from the dismissal by the Court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Cincinnati v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Cincinnati v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API