Legal Opinion
France v. Munson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 7, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The compensation commissioner made a finding and award in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant made a motion for correction of the finding which covered every phase of the claim. With the motion the defendant filed a certified copy of all the evidence, covering seventy-eight pages of legal cap paper, without in any way designating the portions relevant and material to the corrections sought. The commissioner denied the motion on the ground that the defendant had not complied with § 259 of the Practice Book, which provides that when a motion is made to correct a commissioner’s finding it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Palle v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Pabst Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Cichy v. KostykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Smith v. YurkovskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Jenkins v. ReichertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.