Legal Opinion

Palle v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1932No. 5097PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

A proceeding of the industrial commission granting an award of compensation to the applicant, Lloyd Jensen, is brought here by the alleged employer for review. The first point made is that no sufficient application for compensation was made and filed with the commission authorizing it to proceed with and hear the cause. The sufficiency of the application, or the want of one, was timely challenged by the alleged employer at the threshold of the case by demurrer and by his objection to the commission on such ground to hear the case, all of which were overruled.

In the case of Ætna Life Insurance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Millard County v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lacroix v. FrechetteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  4. Kelley v. HaylockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Prows v. HawleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Reed v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lustenberger v. Boston Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Cross v. Hermanson Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Olsen v. Samuel McIntyre Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1998

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API