Legal Opinion

Pabst Corp. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1926PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 6, 1926:

Stevens, J.

The law placing public utilities under the regulation of the railroad commission was passed in 1907. *352It provided that the “term ‘public utility’ . . . shall mean and embrace . . . every town, village, or city that now or hereafter may own, operate, manage, or control any plant” furnishing water to the public. Sec. 196.01, Stats. At the time of the passage of this law Milwaukee was a city which owned and operated its own water plant. Language could not have been chosen which would have evidenced a clearer legislative intent to subject…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Piper v. City of MadisowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Milwaukee Sales & Investment Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Dallmann v. DallmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Boddenhagen v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Ohlenforst v. BeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. American Motors Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Christoph v. City of ChiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wheeler v. B. of Com'rs. City of HopkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Johnson v. Wisconsin Lumber & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API