Legal Opinion

Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 27, 1952PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

The plaintiffs are 395 in number. On November 7,1945, they were in the employ of The Yale & Towne Manufacturing Company, hereinafter called the company. Subsequent to that date, they applied for relief under the Unemployment Compensation Act. A panel of three commissioners, sustaining the administrator’s ruling, awarded them benefits for twenty-two weeks. On the company’s appeal from that decision, the Superior Court reduced the compensable weeks to four. Both the company and the plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment rendered by the court. The ultimate grievance of the plaintiffs is…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. In Re the Eligibility of the Persons Employed at the St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. General Motors Corporation v. MulquinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  5. Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Conley v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Wilson v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dempsey v. TynanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Guevara v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API