Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Reichert
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 8, 1939PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The amended complaint alleged and the plaintiff offered evidence to prove that he was employed by the defendants, who are husband and wife, in the excavation of a cellar and while so engaged was injured by the falling upon his foot of a large stone which, he alleged, the defendants negligently left in a precarious position; also that the defendants regularly employed five or more employees but failed to conform to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, General Statutes, Cum Sup. 1935, § 1615c, which requires either proof of financial ability to pay compensation or security or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Belevicze v. Platt Bros & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Stedman v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Knox v. BinkoskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Green v. BenedictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Morrone v. JoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Fish v. FishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.