Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellant commenced this action against respondent for contribution to personal-injury damages awarded to a retreat participant in a separate slip-and-fall case. Appellant challenges summary judgment in favor of respondent, arguing that (1) as a possessor of the land, respondent owed the retreat participant a legal duty to keep the premises safe, and (2) respondent assumed a duty of care when it undertook appellant-landowner’s duty to salt and chop the ice in the location of the retreat participant’s fall. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for trial. We…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Demond v. Project Service, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Knife River Corp.-South v. HinojosaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Miller v. Soo Line R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Bell v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- John Osmanski v. James and Jean Way d/b/a J & J Real Estate Properties, Shakopee Distribution Services, LLC, d/b/a the Chanhassen Depot, Star Tribune Media CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.