Legal Opinion

Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 2011No. A10-1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant commenced this action against respondent for contribution to personal-injury damages awarded to a retreat participant in a separate slip-and-fall case. Appellant challenges summary judgment in favor of respondent, arguing that (1) as a possessor of the land, respondent owed the retreat participant a legal duty to keep the premises safe, and (2) respondent assumed a duty of care when it undertook appellant-landowner’s duty to salt and chop the ice in the location of the retreat participant’s fall. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for trial. We…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Demond v. Project Service, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  2. Knife River Corp.-South v. HinojosaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Miller v. Soo Line R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  4. Bell v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  5. John Osmanski v. James and Jean Way d/b/a J & J Real Estate Properties, Shakopee Distribution Services, LLC, d/b/a the Chanhassen Depot, Star Tribune Media CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API