Legal Opinion
Bell v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 17, 2021No. 0:20-cv-01393Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Nicolas Bell, Case No. 20-cv-1393 (WMW/KMM) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (Union Pacific) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Nicolas Bell’s complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Dkt. 9.) For the reasons addressed below, the motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. BACKGROUND Nicolas Bell alleges that, on or about June 12, 2014, he was injured…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mattes v. ABC Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Blankenship v. USA Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Isler Ex Rel. Isler v. BurmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.