Legal Opinion
Ting v. AT & T
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 15, 2002No. C 01-02969 BZPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this action, defendant American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT & T”) is being sued by its California customers for attempting to impose a new contract containing provisions which allegedly violate California contract and consumer protection laws. 1 The complaint was filed in Alameda County Superior Court the day before the new contract was to start taking effect. Defendant immediately removed the action to this court, invoking this court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Frank H. Boomer, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. At & T Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Kristian v. Comcast Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Gutierrez v. Autowest, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.