Legal Opinion

Storer Communications, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1988No. 86-1836PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we consider inclusion of income derived from sales of non-tangible personal property in the sales factor of the three-factor formula set forth in R.C. 5733.05(B)(2) (c). For the reasons stated below, we reverse the decision of the BTA.

Under R.C. 5733.05(B)(2)(c), the sales factor of the three-factor formula is a fraction composed of the taxpayer’s business done in Ohio divided by the taxpayer’s business done everywhere. The inclusion of sales of non-tangible personal property in business done in Ohio is governed by the following pertinent language of this provision:

*194“Sales, other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Youngstown Club v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Smith, 1-07-58 (6-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. HurdOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Canales-Flores v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Shell v. Ohio Veterinary Medical Licensing BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API