Legal Opinion

State v. Hurd

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2000No. 99-1140PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

Appellee Hurd was charged with making false representations in regard to registering securities by description. R.C. 1707.44(B)(1). The evidence presented at trial established that any false representations that were made were in regard to registering transactions by description. In its appeal, the state has asked us to determine, for the purposes of imposing criminal liability pursuant to R.C. 1707.44(B)(1), that making false representations in regard to registering transactions by description is the equivalent of making false representations in regard to registering securities by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Herman v. KlopfleischOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. SwayOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Storer Communications, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. Kaforey (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In Re TudorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  3. Alexander Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Vill. of AlbanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. HurdOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. Abi-AazarOhio Court of Appeals · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API