Provident Bank v. Wood
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Paul W. Bbowít, J.
In this case, the court is asked to determine whether the term of the award of interim funds was for the entire two-year designation period, or whether the term of the award was limited to the six-months term of the instrument evidencing the deposit executed subsequent to that award. Stated another way, we must decide whether the term of the award of the interim deposit must be for “not less than thirty days nor more than one year,” the minimum and maximum maturities decreed by B, C, 135,09 for deposits of interim funds,
*104For the reasons set forth below, we find that the term,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by193 opinions
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Straley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HornerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.