Legal Opinion

Sears v. Weimer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1944No. 29843PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

The question for decision is whether jurisdiction in the original action was obtained in a manner which permits a dormant judgment to be revived against a nonresident of the state upon whom service was had by publication only. Our decision is to be governed by the provisions of Section 11646, General Code, which reads as follows:

“When either party to such dormant judgment or finding,- his agent or attorney, makes affidavit showing that the adverse party is not a resident of the state, that such judgment or finding remains unsatisfied in whole or part and the amount owing thereon, service may…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thisler v. LittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. McKenzie v. BoyntonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. First National Bank v. HolmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Dalton v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1991

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API