Legal Opinion

Gulf Oil Corp. v. Kosydar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1975No. 75-497PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.

The issue before the court, as it was before the Tax Commissioner and the Board of Tax Appeals, concerns construction of the “business done” apportionment formula contained in R. C. 5733.05 as it applied to tax years 1970 and 1971.

At that time, R. C. 5733.05 provided, in pertinent part:

“* * * j;ake tbe other part and multiply by a fraction whose numerator is the value of the business done, measured by sales of tangible personal property, by the corporation in this state during the year preceding the date of the commencement of its current annual accounting period, and whose denominator is the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Henry v. Central National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Accountant's Computer Services, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Clay v. Cuyahoga Cty. Med. Examiner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API