Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Foster v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1944No. 29779PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Alleging that respondent was in possession of information of specific sales of tangible personal property made by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (hereinafter referred to as A. & P.) and The Kroger Grocery & Baking Company (hereinafter called Kroger)’ during the year 1935, relator sought and the Court of Appeals granted a peremptory writ of mandamus against respondent as Tax Commissioner directing him to make assessments agaixxst both A. & P. and Kroger, 'according to formulae contained in the couxd’s journal entry, the details of which will be discussed later.

Whether the action of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. University of Toledo FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Vought Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API