Legal Opinion

Ford & Vlahos v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1994No. S035748PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

—This case presents a narrow question of law: whether the California version of Uniform Commercial Code section 9-504, subdivision (3), definitively limits a secured party’s duty to advertise the sale of collateral merely to placing a legal notice in a newspaper. We conclude it does not, and therefore reverse the Court of Appeal’s judgment and remand the case for consideration of the secured party’s other claims of error.

Defendant secured party lent plaintiff debtor money to buy a Lockheed Hercules C-130A aircraft and acquired a purchase-money security interest in it. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Levers v. Rio King Land & Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Westgate State Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Prize Frize, Inc. v. Matrix (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Prize Frize, Inc. v. MatrixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Vernon S. v. Jerome C.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mason v. RETIREMENT BD. CITY & COUNTY SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API