Lennane v. Franchise Tax Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
We granted review in this case to construe tax statutes— Revenue and Taxation Code sections 17063.11 and 18162.5—that have been repealed yet continue to govern the disposition of outstanding tax claims in excess of $300 million. At issue is the extent of California income tax liability for capital gain on the sale of “small business stock” that plaintiffs and other California taxpayers acquired on or before September 16, 1981, and sold between 1981 and 1987.
For the tax year 1986 (the tax year at issue here), capital gain from the sale of assets that had been held for more…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Kizer v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by119 opinions
- People v. AlbillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.