McAlinden v. Nelson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
The first amended complaint herein alleges that by written agreement of May 11, 1950, “defendants” employed plaintiff to sell a piece of realty owned by them at a specified price of $25,500, and that they agreed to pay him a commission of 5 per cent of the selling price. On July 8, 1950, the listing agreement was extended for an additional 90 days. The extension was signed by plaintiff and defendant Simeon B. Nelson.
On July 16, 1950, plaintiff procured purchasers, who agreed to buy the listed property for $18,600. On that day, defendant signed a deposit receipt in which he agreed to complete…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Traxler v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Kaufman v. HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Ikeoka v. KongHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- Steve Schmidt & Co. v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- McHugh v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.