Legal Opinion
Steve Schmidt & Co. v. Berry
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1986No. F005478PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J.
Defendant, David L. Berry (Berry), appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Steve Schmidt & Co. (Schmidt & Co.), for $57,750, representing a real estate commission, plus attorney’s fees and costs. Schmidt & Co., a licensed real estate broker, sued Berry, Darwin G. Shebelut (Shebelut) and Charles Tingey Associates, Inc. (Tingey), 1 seeking declaratory relief, damages for breach of contract and damages as a third party beneficiary.
Facts
The recited facts are gleaned from the uncontradicted evidence submitted by Schmidt & Co. in support of its…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Real Property Services Corp. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Roberts v. LomantoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Colbaugh v. HartlineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Curry v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.