Legal Opinion

Ikeoka v. Kong

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1963No. 4269PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*221OPINION OP THE COURT BY

MIZUHA, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Katsunori Ikeoka and his mother, Onami Ikeoka, residents of Honolulu, instituted this suit, alleging in their complaint that defendant-appellee, John H. Kong of Hilo, a real estate broker, was indebted to them in the sum of $2,500 for monies paid to him. Defendant entered a general denial and by way of counter-claim, alleged that the plaintiffs were indebted to him for the unpaid balance of broker’s commissions in the amount of $3,900. Trial was had without a jury and judgment rendered in favor of defendant in the sum of $3,900.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Patterson v. . MeyerhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kahili, Inc. v. YamamotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Windward Partners v. LopesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Fireside Thrift of Hawaii, Inc. v. Kealoha (In Re Kealoha)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
  4. Property House, Inc. v. KelleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Furuya v. Association of Apartment Owners of Pacific Monarch, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API