Traxler v. Katz

The plaintiff sued to recover broker’s commissions alleged to be due and owing to him from the defendant’s testator. The defendant asserts that there is no testimony to support the finding that the plaintiff performed the contract under which he claims relief. She also asserts that there was no agreement employing the plaintiff. And she further asserts that the purported agree ment was one of exchange and that there was found to be a material defect in the title to Ehrlich’s property which was not removed and therefore no commission was earned. These several contentions we think may best be…