Russell v. Ramm
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The petition for a hearing herein after decision by the- district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district was granted chiefly for the reason that the opinion of Mr. Justice Hart therein did not refer to or sufficiently distinguish the decision of this court in the case of Merzoian v. Kludjian, 183 Cal. 422 [191 Pac. 673], from the case at bar. We are of the opinion that both as to the facts and the principles of law involved the cases are easily distinguishable. In the case of Merzoian v. Kludjian, supra, it affirmatively appeared that the purchaser who had been procured by…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Barber v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Johnson v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.