Mendocino County v. Peters
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Mendocino County authorizing the plaintiff to take possession of land pendente lite. J. Q. White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
In this action an appeal was taken from the judgment condemning lands therein described, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial. The judgment and order so appealed from were affirmed. (See County of Mendocino v. Peters, ante, p. 24, [82 Pac. 1122].) The present appeal is from an order, made after such judgment was entered, decreeing “that said plaintiff take possession of and use the property described therein during the pendency of and until the final conclusion of the litigation herein.” The judgment having been affirmed, no judgment which could be rendered on this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foster v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- San Diego School District v. Board of Supervisors of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Bradley v. VoorsangerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Weaver v. ReddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burks v. BronsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Reeves v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Kootenai County v. WhiteIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. FitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922