Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Watson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1932No. Docket Nos. 492, 876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOVEL, J., pro tem.

This is an action in unlawful detainer. It appears from the transcript that in 1928, plaintiffs, who were the owners of the real property involved herein, leased the same to defendant Watson for a period of approximately two years commencing July 20, 1929. Watson went into possession of the property upon the execution of the lease in 1928 and at said time executed a note in the principal sum of $2,000 as evidence of the amount of the rental, which, under the terms of the lease, fell due April 1, 1929. Neither the note nor the rental it evidenced were paid. A three days’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burks v. BronsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Agoure v. PlummerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Pacific Southwest Royalties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Carey v. Glenco Citrus ProductsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Societa Italiana Di Mutua Beneficenza v. BurrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API