Bradley v. Voorsanger
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Plaintiff, a taxpayer, seeks -to enjoin the defendants the board of election commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco, and defendant the registrar of voters, from expending any money, making or drawing any demands in writing upon the funds of said city and county for the purpose of procuring to be held and holding in said city and county a general election in November, 1903, to fill the offices of mayor, eighteen supervisors, auditor, treasurer, assessor, tax-collector, recorder, city attorney, district attorney, public administrator, county clerk, sheriff, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Britton v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Foster v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Peremptory Mandamus to ManningNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Harron v. HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Weaver v. ReddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Lenahan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Goldsmith v. Board of Education of Sacramento City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Reid v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Long v. HultbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.