Weaver v. Reddy
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William Denman, and Chickering, Thomas & Gregory, for Appellant. Reddy, Campbell & Metson, and Garret W. McEnerney, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff alleges that he was unjustly, and in violation of the law, removed by the board of health of the city and county of San Francisco from the position of superintendent of the alms-house of the city and county, and he brings this action against the board of health and against the defendant Edward A. Reddy to secure a judgment for his reinstatement. The board of health here made defendant is the board created by the general state law, which at that time had sole control of the alms-house. Since the commencement of the action, however, the new charter of the city and county of San…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Madison v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Goldsmith v. Board of Education of Sacramento City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Reid v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Bradley v. VoorsangerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re LincolnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.