Legal Opinion

Burks v. Bronson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1922No. Civ. No. 3865PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This action is one for specific performance of a contract for the sale of a lot. The defendants and respondents ask that the appeal he dismissed and base their contention in this regard upon the following facts:

Upon the date of the trial, to wit, February 23, 1921, and when the plaintiff had closed his case, a motion for a nonsuit was made by the defendants, was ordered granted by the court; on the same day this order was entered on the minutes» and noted in the register of actions by the clerk. From this judgment no appeal has been taken. On March 22, 1921, the trial court entered a second…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Darlington v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Amorisia v. RandoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Finch v. EkstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Fisch & Co., Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Fuller v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Gullick v. Interstate Drilling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API