Legal Opinion
Diehl v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 23, 1996No. 6:93-cv-06207PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, all former employees of Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) in the Information Management function of its United States Customer Operations and Corporate Strategic Services groups, bring these actions pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. and the New York State Human Rights Law, alleging that they were redeployed and dismissed from their positions on the basis of their ages and gender.
On February 1, 1996, defendant filed summary…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Wado v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Schallop v. New York State Department of LawDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Hunt v. Tektronix, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.