Legal Opinion

McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 20, 2004No. CIV.A.01-0510 ESHPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs’ statistical expert pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). Sodexho contends that Dr. Bernard Siskin’s reports are both structurally flawed and “riddled with errors,” he knows too little about defendant’s operations to analyze them competently, he failed to control for major factors in performing his analyses, 1 he destroyed documents underlying his analyses that should have been disclosed to defendant,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  3. Rothe Development, Inc. v. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Moore v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. State v. Leo Paul Pratt IISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API