Legal Opinion
Wado v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 16, 1998No. 6:95-cv-06096PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
These fifteen cases arise out of the fifteen plaintiffs’ terminations from employment by defendant Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) in 1994. Plaintiffs assert claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., Title VII of the CM Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and certain other anti-discrimination laws. Xerox has moved for summary judgment, and it has also moved in limine to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert, Philip A. Smethurst, Ph.D. Because these eases involve many of the same…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Smith v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Kolesnikow v. Hudson Valley Hospital CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Scott v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Pronin v. Raffi Custom Photo Lab., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Murphy v. Board of Education of the Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.