Legal Opinion
Smith v. Xerox Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 5, 1999No. Nos. 98-7178, 98-7182, 98-7184, 98-7186, 98-7188, 98-7196, 98-7198, 98-7202, 98-7204, 98-7206, 98-7208 and 98-7212PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western • District of New York (David G. Larimer, Chief Judge) entered January 16, 1998, granting summary judgment for Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) on the plaintiffs’ employment discrimination claims based on both disparate treatment and disparate impact theories.
I. BACKGROUND-
A. Facts
The facts of this case are more fully set forth by the district court in its decision, see Wado v. Xerox Corp., 991 F.Supp. 174 (W.D.NY.1998); therefore, we will repeat only those facts…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Nicole Schiano v. Quality Payroll Systems, Inc. And Michael Tintweiss, Docket No. 05-4115 CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Chin v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Jesse Brown, Rev., On Behalf Of Himself And All Members Of The Uptown Coalition For Tobacco Control And Health v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Tabor v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Baity v. KralikDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.