Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Tektronix, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 5, 1997No. 6:93-cv-06319PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
This is an age discrimination case brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. (“ADEA”) and New York’s Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law § 290, et seq. (“NYHRL”). Presently before me is defendant’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion for sanctions. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is denied in part and granted in part. The motion for sanctions is denied.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Tektronix manufactures and supplies, inter alia, electronic testing and measuring…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eugene W. Slattery v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Greenbaum v. HandelsbankenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Wado v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Collins-Pearcy v. Mediterranean Shipping Co. (USA)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Scheidecker v. Arvig Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.