Legal Opinion
In Re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 15, 2007No. Master Docket No. C04-01648 MJJ, No. C06-05700 MJJPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are five motions to dismiss brought by Defendants Chemtura Corporation and Uniroyal Chemical Company (C 04-1648, Docket No. 433), Defendant Michael Duchesne (C 06-5700, Docket No. 71), Defendant Joseph B. Eisenberg (C 06-5700, Docket No. 65), Defendant Peter D. Welch (C 06-5700, Docket No. 77), and Defendant James J. Conway (C06-5700, Docket No. 90.)
For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART each of the Motions, as discussed below.
F…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Mediostream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Garrison v. Oracle Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- In Re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.