Legal Opinion
In Re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 15, 2011No. MDL Docket No. 2196. Index No. 10 MD 2196(JZ)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
Introduction
This matter is before the Court on a series of Motions to Dismiss the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint (“the CAC”) (Doc. Nos. 89; 91-92; 95-97; 99-103; 109), and the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ (collectively with the Direct Purchaser . Plaintiffs “Plaintiffs”) Consolidated Amended Complaint (“the ICAC” or collectively with the CAC “the Complaints”) (Doc. Nos. 120-22; 125-30) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The parties fully briefed the Motions, and responded in writing to questions…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Allen v. Andersen Windows, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.