Legal Opinion
Garrison v. Oracle Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 2, 2016No. Case No. 14-CV-04592-LHKPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 110, 137, 138
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Greg Garrison (“Garrison”), Deborah Van Vorst (“Van Vorst”), and Sastry Hari (“Hari”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendant Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) for alleged violations of federal and California antitrust laws. ECF No. 105 (Second Amended Complaint, or “SAC”).1 Before the Court is Oracle’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 110. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- (PS) Gianelli v. SchoenfeldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Brodsky v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Brown v. JBS USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Crowder v. LinkedIn CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.