Legal Opinion
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 25, 2008No. M 07-1827 SI. MDL. No. 1827PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINTS
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Now before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss the consolidated complaints filed by the direct and indirect purchaser plaintiffs. For the reasons set forth below, the Court concludes that the consolidated complaints meet the standard enunciated in Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), because the complaints allege parallel conduct in addition to a number of other facts plausibly suggesting an agreement to fix prices.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Low v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- In Re Digital Music Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.