Legal Opinion

Mediostream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 23, 2012No. C-11-03095 RMWPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Defendants Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America (collectively, “Sony”), Sonic Solutions, LLC (“Sonic”) and James Taylor (“Taylor”) move to dismiss plaintiff MedioStream, Ine.’s (“MedioStream”) claims for violations of the Sherman Act, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition and conversion. Having considered the parties’ briefing and oral argument, the court grants the motions to dismiss with leave to -amend within thirty days of the date of this order.

I.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
  2. Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  3. Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. Orchard Supply Hardware LLC v. Home Depot USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  5. Access Optical Networks, Inc. v. Seagate Technology LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API